Attorneys and IP teams draw patents with four kinds of tools: AI-native patent software, general CAD, diagramming apps, and outsourced services. Here is how they compare on the criteria that decide filings.

Six criteria that separate patent-grade tools from generic drawing apps.
Line weights, margins, and numbering per USPTO/EPO/CNIPA/JPO/KIPO/PCT rules.
The same part keeps the same numeral across every view, automatically.
Perspective, elevations, exploded, cross-section — and design view sets.
Start from a text description, photo, sketch, or screenshot — not a blank canvas.
Catch objections before filing, not in an office action.
PNG at 300/600 DPI, SVG, DXF, and vector PDF.
Each gets the job done somewhere — only one was built for it.
Generates compliant figures from descriptions or images; checker and exports included.
Unmatched precision, but no patent rules, steep learning curve, and manual numbering.
Fine for flowcharts and block diagrams; cannot produce mechanical line art.
Professional quality at $25–$300 per figure with 7–10 day turnaround.
Why patent-native software beats adapting CAD or diagramming apps.
2026 comparison
Generate compliant figures from a description, validate against your office, and export filing-ready files.